EMA COVID-19 vaccines against SARS-CoV-2(2019nCoV) studies for approval guidance
Table of contents
- · What types of studies are needed to approve a COVID-19 vaccine?
- · What are efficacy studies?
- · How is the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines studied?
- · How many participants take part in efficacy studies and for how long?
- · What is the level of efficacy that can be accepted for approval?
- · Which benefits might not be known when a COVID-19 vaccine is initially approved?
- · How is safety studied before approval?
- · What data have to be provided for special populations and age groups?
- · What studies are needed after approval?
- · How are clinical studies carried out in other parts of the world?
What types of studies are needed to approve a COVID-19 vaccine?
A company developing a COVID-19 vaccine must submit an application to EMA containing data from various studies:- Pharmaceutical quality studies
- Non-clinical studies
- Clinical studies
Pharmaceutical quality studies
Non-clinical studies
Clinical studies
----------------------------
For more information, see:
For more information, see:
What are efficacy studies?
Efficacy
studies are large studies that evaluate the benefit of a
medicine. For vaccines, these studies usually involve thousands of
volunteers. The main efficacy
studies for COVID-19 vaccines involve tens of thousands of participants.
Developers first test first the vaccine's efficacy
in people who have not previously come into contact with the virus that causes
COVID-19 disease. These people are more difficult to protect than people who
have already come into contact with the virus. They represent the majority of the
general population. The feasibility of determining whether a vaccine can protect
people against disease depends on whether the virus is circulating and on
whether there are any cases of disease that can be prevented.
How is the efficacy of COVID-19 vaccines studied?
In efficacy
studies, volunteers randomly receive either the
vaccine or an alternative. This alternative could be a vaccine that does not protect
against COVID-19 or a placebo (a dummy treatment). Normally, the doctors,
clinical study participants and the company carrying out the study do not know
who has received the vaccine and who has received the control. This is important to
avoid errors when interpreting study results. The studies measure efficacy
‘endpoints’ to see how well the vaccine works in the study and the
level of protection it offers to participants. Regulatory agencies recommend
that the main endpoint (primary endpoint) should be how well a vaccine prevents
laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 disease of any severity. This means
how well the vaccine prevents symptomatic disease in people
infected with SARS-CoV-2 as confirmed by a laboratory test. For more
information, see the statement published by members of the International
Coalition of Medicines Regulatory Authorities (ICMRA) in July 2020: ICMRA statement on clinical
trials
The reduction in number of people needing hospitalisation
or mechanical ventilation or the reduction in the number of deaths can help
measure the efficacy of the vaccine in reducing disease severity.
Did you
know..? Efficacy
studies also look at other relevant 'secondary endpoints',
which give an idea of the other benefits of
the vaccine. For example, a vaccine may reduce:
|
How many participants take part in efficacy studies and for how long?
Regulators need at least one main efficacy
study in many thousands of participants (over 30,000) to
rapidly detect a sufficient number of cases of disease that allows concluding on how
much protection a vaccine can provide. Initially, companies analyse the main
study results after a few months of follow-up and submit the results to
regulators, including EMA. This allows regulators
to approve vaccines as soon as possible after the results confirm that
the vaccine’s benefits exceed any potential risk.
Did you know..? The efficacy studies may continue for two years or more, to allow the company to collect information on long-term protection and safety. This means that the company will collect some of the follow-up data after approval, when the vaccine is being used widely. This is acceptable, because regulators will have concluded that the data initially assessed are sufficient to show the vaccine’s efficacy and safety. Observational studies will also collect data on the effectiveness of the vaccine in real life, allowing for the monitoring of its performance in a timely manner. This allows medicine developers and regulators to take actions if necessary. |
What is the level of efficacy that can be accepted for approval?
EMA has not set a minimum level of efficacy
for approval. This is because it looks at the overall balance
of safety and efficacy
for each vaccine individually before concluding on whether or not it
will approve the vaccine. As an example, 'vaccine A' could have a lower
efficacy than 'vaccine B'. However, vaccine A could have other
advantages, such as:
- · fewer side effects;
- · easy storage and delivery;
- · better results in a specific age group or type of population.
What do the different efficacy levels mean?
Which benefits might not be known when a COVID-19 vaccine is initially approved?
When EMA first approves a vaccine, some
benefits may still be uncertain. The benefits will only become clearer
after the vaccine is in use. Over time, regulators may get more information
about:
- asymptomatic cases after vaccination, i.e the number of people who get infected with the virus but do not develop symptoms. This is important because these people can still spread the virus to others;
- whether the vaccine can reduce the spread of the virus in the community. Reducing transmission will depend on many factors, including how many people get vaccinated;
- the vaccine’s effectiveness in the real world, i.e. outside the controlled setting of clinical studies.
How is safety studied before approval?
Clinical trials will have to show that the benefits in protecting people
against COVID-19 are far greater than the risks and the potential
risk of side effects. Several thousand individuals will have
received the vaccine at the time of evaluation. This will allow
regulators to assess side effects that affect at least
1 in 1,000 vaccinated people.
For more information, see
Did you know..? As most side effects occur within four to six weeks after receiving a vaccine, safety data have to cover at least six weeks after completion of vaccination, for approval purposes. However, the studies will follow volunteers up for at least a year to see if there are any longer-term side effects. Side effects of a new vaccine that are so rare that affect less than 1 in 10,000 people can only be detected after collection of very large data sets. This is likely to be feasible only once large numbers of people have received the vaccine. A robust safety monitoring plan is in place in the EU to gather and evaluate any side effects that may arise during vaccination campaigns promptly. |
What data have to be provided for special populations and age groups?
Vaccine studies focus on
adults, including older adults, as well as people with underlying
diseases that put them at particular risk of severe COVID-19
disease. Some studies may also include adolescents from 16 years
of age. People above 65 years of age
should represent at least a quarter of the total number of
participants in studies. This group is at greatest risk of
severe COVID-19 disease. Results from earlier safety and
immunogenicity testing determine whether these people
should be included in large clinical studies. Studies
should also include people from ethnic minorities.
Investigations into the use of COVID-19 vaccines
in children are planned for once
there is sufficient information from studies in adults and
adolescents. For more information, see
What studies are needed after approval?
Data from
long-term clinical studies on safety and
efficacy are
important for a number of reasons. These data allow the
assessment of how protection against
COVID-19 evolves over time, such as if the
level of antibodies in the blood might go down after some time.
Long-term data are also important to assess whether there
is any risk of vaccine-associated enhanced
disease (VAED). VAED is a condition that would
occur when a vaccinated person subsequently infected with a
virus develops a more severe disease than they would have had if
they were not vaccinated. This has been seen in animal
models given vaccines against SARS or MERS (different types of
coronaviruses causing severe disease) and never with humans
given such SARS or MERS vaccines. VAED has not been seen with
COVID-19 vaccines in any studies done so far. For more
information, see:
How are clinical studies carried out in other parts of the world?
Since the COVID-19
pandemic affects people worldwide, it is important
for companies developing COVID-19 vaccines to generate
robust evidence that meets the needs of regulators around
the globe. This is why EMA and other
medicines’ regulators have agreed key
principles on how to carry out clinical
trials for COVID-19 vaccines. Companies applying
for approval of a vaccine in the EU must ensure that
clinical studies meet stringent EU
requirements no matter where in the world they
took place. For more information, see: